The debate on youth subsidy has gathered pace. The arguments for a youth subsidy consist of two major arguments.
First, the high rates of unemployment amongst youth are exceedingly worrying. As shown in a previous chart on Zapreneur. The key features of the unemployment data by age, show that:
The key features of the data include that:
- The biggest proportion of unemployed are concentrated in the age groups 15-24 years (29.5%) and 25-34 years (42.8%).
- Unemployment for those 34 years old and younger accounts for 72,3% of unemployed South Africans.
Youth unemployment thus is a serious challenge, and perhaps the defining challenge that we face.
Second, that the youth subsidy address the core issue of high wages, thus ensuring that young people will be employed. It is on this point that the majority of the debate has focused. Those is support of the youth subsidy argue that through providing employers with a way to reduce the risk of employing young people. A recent and rare press statement by Business Leadership South Africa makes the following point:
BLSA strongly endorsed Treasury’s youth wage subsidy proposals, currently before NEDLAC, and committed members to participating in the scheme. Providing opportunities for young unemployed South Africans required innovation and risk taking and BLSA commended government for this important initiative. BLSA is confident that subsidy proposals would not be abused by members to replace or displace existing workers with young workers merely to gain from the subsidy.
Those arguing against the youth subsidy proposals, argue that it will result in a dual labour market, and ultimately a “race-to-the-bottom”. Here is Cosatu, in coalition with churches and non-government organisations, under the People’s Budget Coalition, on the youth subsidy proposals:
The People’s Budget Coalition (PBC) will be seeking further clarity on the proposed subsidy to employers that will lower the cost of hiring young people without work experience. While we note that such employees will be “subject to minimum labour standards”, we are still concerned that this scheme could lead to a two-tier labour market. Our suspicions arise from the fact that the “employment” chapter of the budget review talks about introducing a separate lower minimum wage for the youth, citing Chile,Czech Republic, Turkey etc as examples.
The eventual basket of minimum standards that the budget review talks about is not what we currently have. There are also references to introducing “regulatory reform and employment incentives to make the cost of labour more competitive” in labour intensive industrial and export zones, which would apply to all workers.
The debate misses an important feature on the educational profile of the unemployed. The Quarterly Labour Force Survey (2nd Quarter, 2011) provides data on education and the unemployment rate. The data as shown in the chart below raises significant questions.
The data shows that there is a relationship between educational attainment and unemployment is important enough to enter the debate, as the majority of unemployed (over 90%) have a matric or less. This is not to imply that there is a stronger correlation between education and unemployment, as compared to wages. Rather it is to indicate that good policy choices can only be made once the relative importance of wages, education and other factors impacting on youth unemployment are carefully assessed.
This should be undertaken with urgency, if the impasse on deliberate action on youth unemployment is to be assessed.
Read More on Youth Unemployment
5 thoughts on “Youth subsidy – Bringing education into the picture”
Being unemployed is not cool,pls help us.
Being unemployed is not cool,pls help
us..I’m a 23 year old lady,with matric,a drivers licence.a short course in HOUR and labour relations,a shortcourse in public relations and was busy with a diploma in local government finance but cnt finish because I can’t pay.pls help,I’m desperate
Hi Priscilla, Thank you for writing and sharing your story. I regularly get emails like this, and am looking at ways to respond to the problems that readers of Zapreneur have. There must be a way to respond to your situation, and those of others.
Youth unemployment is another revolution to compel government, organised business and organised labour to be innovative in their response to the crisis.
Young people with grade 12 or 9 are not a liability, but assets to be trained.
Do we then need subsidy to do this effectively? The gvt and employers are already paying the subsidies through skills levies. Young people on learnerships have direct access to work exposure. How is SA doing on that front?
Can the youth wage subsidy (YWS) be a supplement to the job fund and skills fund?
The problem seems to be the coordination and performance of the existing systems.
Can the YWS create a dual labour system? Yes there are chances for that? There are big chances for exploitation of the YWS by employers. BBBEE, tax evasion and others are cases in point.
that doesn’t, however, prevent us from paying taxes and implementing the BBBEE. COSATU and NGO’s arguments are based on the poor legislative monitoring and evaluation.
It is time that the YWS is assessed on post implementation as young people are suffering and not all employers are likely to exploit the system.
COSATU can come with other innovative monitoring and evaluation systems like the Corruption Watch to ensure that the system is not abused.
Thanks for reading Zapreneur, and contributing to the debate. I agree that coordination between initiatives remains a huge problem. I think we should have support for young people, just not convinced that the youth wage subsidy is the way to go.
Comments are closed.